Bypass distal con vena autóloga invertida / Distal inverted autologous vein bypass

La derivación (bypass) con vena autóloga invertida es, sin lugar a dudas, uno de los procedimientos fundamentales en la revascularización de los miembros isquémicos de las extremidades inferiores. De hecho, fue el primero en desarrollarse (Jean Kunlin). Los autores de este artículo describen su forma tradicional de realizarlo y sus trucos, así como sus maneras de abordar y de evitar problemas, pero lo hacen con un lenguaje práctico (“cómo lo hago”) que ayude a entender el procedimiento a médicos jóvenes en formación. Durante la descripción se mencionan algunas técnicas alternativas, conscientes de que a buen seguro habrá otras y que otros cirujanos lo harán con pequeñas modificaciones.(AU)

The autologous distal vein bypass with an inverted vein is, without doubt, one of the main procedures in the revascularization of ischemic limbs of the lower extremities. In fact, it was the first to be developed (Jean Kunlin). The authors of this article describe their traditional way of doing it, their tricks, their ways of approaching and avoiding problems, but they explain their “how I do it” with a practical language that helps to understand the procedure by young doctors in training. During the description, some technical alternatives are mentioned, aware that there will surely be others and that others vascular surgeons will do so with minor modifi cations.(AU)

Cardiovascular devices; reclassification of nonroller-type cardiopulmonary bypass blood pumps for cardiopulmonary and circulatory bypass; effective date of requirement for premarket approval for nonroller-type cardiopulmonary bypass blood pumps for temporary ventricular support. Final order.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing a final order to reclassify nonroller-type cardiopulmonary bypass blood pump (NRP) devices for cardiopulmonary and circulatory bypass, a preamendments class III device, into class II (special controls), and to require the filing of a premarket approval application (PMA) for NRP devices for temporary ventricular support. FDA is also revising the title and identification of the regulation for NRP devices in this order.

Overview of the 2012 Food and Drug Administration circulatory system devices panel meeting on the reclassification of external counterpulsation, intra-aortic balloon pump, and non-roller-type cardiopulmonary bypass blood pump devices.

The Food and Drug Administration held a Circulatory System Devices Advisory Panel meeting, December 5 and 6, 2012, to review the classification or potential reclassification of the following device types: external counterpulsation, intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), and non-roller-type cardiopulmonary bypass blood pumps. These 3 devices are preamendment (Medical Device Amendments of 1976) class III devices. The advisory panel discussed the data and provided recommendations for reclassification of these devices. The panel recommended reclassification of ECP to class II for stable angina pectoris and to retain a class III for all other indications. For IABP, the recommendation was to reclassify IABP to class II for several indications (acute coronary syndrome, cardiac and noncardiac surgery, and heart failure complications) and remain class III for all other indications. As for non-roller type, the panel recommended that for cardiopulmonary bypass and temporary circulatory bypass, these devices should be reclassified to class II while retaining a class III device status for all other indications, including ventricular support both for hemodynamically unstable patients and for prophylactic support in high-risk percutaneous interventions.

Comparison of the effects of pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass, non-pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on the inflammatory response and S-100beta protein.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effects of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass, and non-pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass techniques on the inflammatory response and the central nervous system in the current study. METHODS: A total of 32 patients who were scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were included in the study. The patients were allocated into three different groups according to the perfusion techniques used during the cardiopulmonary bypass procedure as follows: off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group (n=10); pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass group (n=11); and non-pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass group (n=11). Serum interleukin-6, interleukin-8, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and S-100beta levels were measured preoperatively, and at 0, 6, and 24 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: The postoperative increase in the levels of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 was significantly lower in the off-pump group compared to the other two groups (p<0.05), while there was no significant difference in tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels between the groups. Postoperative S-100ß levels, an indicator of cerebral injury, was significantly lower in the off-pump CABG group compared to the other two groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: We found that off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting had less negative effects on inflammatory response and central nervous system compared to pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass and non-pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass techniques.

Interferon gamma receptor expression on granulocytes of cardiac surgical patients is modulated differently by the type of cardiopulmonary bypass used.

AIMS: To follow the IFNγ receptor expression on monocytes and granulocytes of cardiac surgical patients with respect to the type of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: Expression of IFNγ receptor on monocytes and granulocytes of 26 cardiac surgical patients operated with the use of either "standard" or "miniaturised" CPB was determined by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The significant increase in IFNγ receptor expression on monocytes on the 1(st) and on the 3(rd) postoperative days was revealed in both groups of patients (p<0.001) irrespective of the type of CPB used, being non-significantly different between groups. In contrast, the expression of IFNγ on granulocytes displayed significant differences in terms of the CPB used. Whereas, in "standard" CPB patients, granulocyte INFγ receptor expression reached its maximum immediately after surgery (p<0.01), in "miniivasive" CPB patients, the peak in INFγ receptor expression was postponed to the 1(st) postoperative day (p<0.05). Statistically significantly higher IFNγ receptor expression on granulocytes was found in "standard" CPB patients (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared to "miniaturised" CPB patients, the significantly higher IFNγ receptor expression on granulocytes was found in "standard" CPB patients (p<0.05) on the 1(st) postoperative day.